Skip to main content
All Posts By

Sobia Bibi

Second Victim website

By Uncategorised, Websites

Healthcare employees who have experienced a significant personal or professional impact as a result of a patient safety incident can be referred to as a ‘Second Victim’.

To help minimise the ‘Second Victim’ experience, we devised the ‘Second Victim website’, which is a rich resource to support individuals, teams and organisations, based on our extensive research to date.

The ‘Second Victim website’ is currently endorsed by 22 national organisations, including the BMA, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Royal College of Anaesthetists and Emergency Medicine, Unison and NHS Practitioner Health. To date, the site has had 77,800 total views with an international reach.

You can view the website here.

By Conceptual Models & Frameworks

Patient safety incidents (PSIs) are common and can lead to fatal outcomes. Effective investigation of PSIs is essential to optimize learning and take action to prevent further incidents occurring. Good practice in incidents investigation has been described by the NPSA in the London Protocol. A key step in this protocol is the identification of all contributory factors. The Clinical Human Factors Group also recommends effective contributory factor analysis as part of serious incident investigation.

In 2012, we conducted a systematic review of 83 research studies focusing on the causes of hospital patient safety incidents. The result of this piece of work is the first evidence-based framework of accident causation in hospitals: the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework.

 

The Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework is a tool which has an evidence base for optimizing learning and addressing causes of patient safety incidents by helping clinicians, risk managers and patient safety officers identify contributory factors of PSIs. Incidents that occur in a hospital setting have been well studied and all contributory factors have been mapped. Download the supporting research here.

For further information about the YCFF and associated tools please click here.

Incivility towards racialised staff in the NHS

By Safety Equity Tools

What is the problem?

cartoon depiction of incivilityRacialised incivilities are subtle, everyday acts of disrespect, exclusion, and hostility which are a common but overlooked experience in NHS maternity services. While the NHS promotes equality, diversity, and inclusion, racially minoritised staff remain unfairly exposed to unprofessional behaviours such as incivility, bullying, harassment and abuse (from multiple sources) that harm their wellbeing, teamwork, and pose a risk to patient safety (Keller et al., 2020; Woodhead et al., 2021). These behaviours are often minimised as personality clashes or communication issues, meaning the racialised nature of harm is rarely recognised or addressed. Current safety frameworks focus on systems and individual error but largely ignore how structural inequity and discrimination shape workplace cultures, behaviours and care quality (Schulson et al., 2022; Maben et al., 2023).

Why does it need to be addressed now?

The NHS faces growing workforce pressures and rising reports of discrimination with 86% of NHS Trusts reporting disproportionate exposure of unprofessional behaviours for racially minoritised staff. Without targeted action, the emotional exhaustion and disengagement caused by racialised incivility will continue to undermine staff retention, morale, and the quality and safety of patient care. Existing “listening” systems, such as Freedom to Speak Up, Human Resources and Organisational Development, often lack the racial literacy and sensitivity needed to capture or respond effectively to subtle forms of harm.

What difference will it make?

Addressing racialised incivility is both a moral and clinical imperative. This PhD helped to identify mechanisms and patterns of incivility within a racialised organisation, unearthing the link between uncivil behaviours and their multilevel consequences. The findings highlighted incivility in routine work practices, social interactions and management practices, which illuminates targets for future intervention development. In maternal care, where teamwork and timing save lives, incivility compromised information flow, created delays and disrupted safety preparedness, that threatens care to mothers and babies. The informal and formal listening roles and associated structures, which aimed to support and alleviate these negative behaviours, were often subject to and complicit in minimising incivility experiences and impacts. In addition to their limited resources and poorer decision making influences for change. Embedding equity into safety culture through anti-racism frameworks, compassionate and accountable leadership with structured longer-term evaluation, and better-designed reporting systems can improve staff wellbeing, strengthen teamwork, and enhance patient safety. Tackling these everyday inequities will help create fairer, psychologically safer workplaces and contribute to more inclusive, high-quality maternity care for all.

You can download a visual summary of the PhD here

By Academic Resources, Publications

What are the benefits for healthcare staff in getting involved in applied health research?

Hanbury, A., Parker, E., Lawton, R. et al. The benefits for health care staff of involvement in applied health research: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Sys 23, 104 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01365-1

Read the full paper here

Patient Wellness Questionnaire – Supporting the implementation of Martha’s Rule

By Measurement Tools

In 2017, based on anecdotal evidence that patients and families might have an important role to play detecting and escalating deterioration, we set out to better understand this.

We co-designed a patient wellness questionnaire with patients and staff and tested the extent to which this score was able to predict patient deterioration (Albutt et al, 2017-2022). We found that patients are in a unique position to detect deterioration but they do not always speak up and, when they do, may be ignored.

We went on to evaluate the use of our invention- patient wellness questionnaire in paediatrics and gathered further data to evaluate the predictive utility of the measure (Albutt et al., 2022) In 2023, the NHSE Worry and Concern Collaborative was established, testing and adapting these ideas. We supported this collaborative, offering guidance throughout the programme.

Here we provide guidance on how to implement this as part of Martha’s rule.

Six Steps to De-implementation: A Toolkit for Leaders

By Toolkits, Interventions & Change Strategies

De-Implementation logoWhat is the problem?

Some healthcare practices are implemented without any evidence that they are of benefit, and can add an unnecessary burden to the day-to-day work of healthcare staff. It’s sometimes difficult to identify these practices – they might have become routine, or they might be seen as a regular part of someone’s role. This practical, step-by-step toolkit is a guide to help you think about the healthcare you provide, and identify tasks and processes that you may feel:

  • are not the best use of your time
  • duplicate other tasks and processes
  • do not provide benefits for patients

 

How will this toolkit help?

The toolkit provides tools and resources to help you identify which tasks or processes might be suitable for streamlining, and a step-by-step a guide to developing an evidence-based strategy for safely rethinking, reducing or removing a practice. It has been developed by a team of researchers with experience in this area, through consultation with healthcare professionals and public contributors. The toolkit also provides links to improvement models, ideas from behavioural science and case study examples from healthcare to increase your understanding and help you streamline care while keeping staff and patient experiences and wellbeing at the heart of what you do.

Cover of De-Implementation toolkitYou can find the toolkit here.

What does this mean to patients, the public, health and social care services?

We would like to hear your experiences

We will be building a collection of case studies on this site to share people’s experiences of using the toolkit. You can see an example here.

Share your experiences here

 

By Academic Resources, Publications

Supporting Older People Living With Frailty to Self-Manage Multiple Medicines: An Experience-Based Co-Design of a Complex Intervention Developed in UK Primary Care

Previdoli, G., Simms-Ellis, R., Silcock, J., Alldred, D.P., Cheong, V.-L., Tyndale-Biscoe, S., Tomlinson, J. and Fylan, B. (2025), Supporting Older People Living With Frailty to Self-Manage Multiple Medicines: An Experience-Based Co-Design of a Complex Intervention Developed in UK Primary Care. Health Expectations, 28: e70364. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70364

Read the full paper here

Access the ‘I Manage My Meds’ toolkit here

By Academic Resources, Publications

What can patients tell us about the quality and safety of hospital care? Findings from a UK multicentre survey study

O’Hara JK, et al. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:673–682. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006974

Read the full paper here

By Academic Resources, Publications

Can staff and patient perspectives on hospital safety predict harm-free care? An analysis of staff and patient survey data and routinely collected outcomes

Lawton R, et al. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:369–376. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003691

Read the full paper here